Engine 6 Preview is being developed and tested to make policy retrieval, comparison and validation more traceable. This page opens the design for inspection.
PolicyWatcher keeps its stable 5.5.0 service while Engine 6 Preview r3 advances in a separate authenticated workspace. The 7 November verification records a deployed claim-ledger schema and one bounded Apple run. Completeness, semantic accuracy and full 500-policy/day operation remain unqualified.
Private deployment
Private r3 is online with 47 application tables and 22 migrations. Thirteen authenticated checks passed. EngineClaim and EngineClaimEvidence provide the deployed ledger schema; the bounded hosted run did not exercise ledger writes.
Bounded administrative run
One administrative run covering four Apple policies completed in 8.027 seconds. One fresh HTTP 200 capture remained confirmation_pending; three policies were held because source contracts were missing. Completed tasks do not mean four acquired or qualified documents.
Data preservation
Nine official and configuration table hashes remained unchanged across deployment and the run. Both earlier private reports were preserved. Publication and notifications remain disabled.
The run reached neither AI analysis nor the separate verifier. Both claim-ledger tables remain empty. It does not demonstrate semantic accuracy, hosted ledger write behaviour, source completeness, uninterrupted worker recovery or full operation at 500 policies per day.
Stable and Preview: what can you use today?
01
Which version is public?
PolicyWatcher 5.5.0 is the stable public service, released on 2 November. It retains the established scanner. r3 identifies a private Preview revision, not a new stable release.
02
Can I try Engine 6?
Preview r3 requires administrator access in the separate environment. Anyone can inspect the architecture, evidence and limits here. Experimental scans, reports and results remain private.
03
Are 500 policies per day qualified?
No. The local trial on 500 candidate endpoints attempted 498 retrievals, accepted 383 responses and produced 342 extractions. It did not include the full AI pipeline and does not qualify complete hosted operation.
Three questions guide the experiment.
01
Is this the complete policy?
Check the document identity, required sections, language and final passage against a reviewed source contract.
02
What supports this conclusion?
Keep frozen captures, exact quotations and a separate verification step connected to each proposed change.
03
Can the work recover safely?
Save tasks, attempts and checkpoints so interruption does not erase progress or publish a change twice.
01 / Architecture
Evidence moves through explicit boundaries.
Official sources enter a private working area. This diagram documents the full engine architecture, including its publication boundary. The private preview records observations with publication and delivery disabled. Retrieval, AI analysis and delivery have separate responsibilities.
Official inputs, private working evidence and the publication boundary.
Direct HTTP, HTTP/2 and a configured browser renderer supply bounded retrieval paths. Archive captures do not attest current live availability.
Private work and evidence
Durable tasks, per-origin backoff, frozen artifacts and checkpoints preserve the retrieval and reasoning trail. Observation and publication keep separate policy state.
Publication boundary
Complete, supported changes may commit automatically at lower impact. High impact requires review; missing or uncertain evidence remains held.
Public record and delivery
The baseline, version, change record and queued notification event commit together. Delivery happens later and checks subscription preferences again.
02 / Decision flow
An HTTP success is the start of the checks.
The change path requires two fresh captures in distinct runs, separated by at least one hour and no more than seven days. A 304 response can revalidate a stored representation; it cannot confirm a new change.
Green: verified outcomes. Amber: waiting or review.
Missing contract, source drift, incomplete content or uncertain language → hold and record the reason.
2
Compare with the baseline
Unchanged content → record a verified check. Missing or incompatible baseline → review before comparison.
3
Confirm the candidate
A matching fresh capture in a different run confirms the candidate. A retry or a conditional 304 response does not count as a second capture.
4
Explain every changed block
The analyst must cover the complete delta with exact old/new quotations. A separate verifier assesses every claim and both language versions.
5
Apply the publication gate
Unsupported or uncertain claims → hold. Verified high impact → human review. Complete supported lower-impact changes → atomic commit when publication is enabled.
Human approval does not waive missing evidence. Source or extraction-baseline repairs have their own review path. A purely presentational extraction change does not become a provider policy-change alert.
03 / Entity relationships
The relationships behind a recorded change.
This is a conceptual map of the implemented preview schema. A solid line is an explicit database foreign key; dashed lines are application-managed references, including identifiers in checkpoints and evidence payloads.
Recorded verification, updated 11 November 2026. Historical regression and campaign results are retained. Local production-mode and generated standalone-server checks are reported separately from hosted verification and production accuracy.
11 November: independent Fable audit
29 numbered findings retained with a remediation register
Read-only model-assisted inspection, not execution or certification. The original report and the subsequent patch review distinguish bounded fixes from open research gates. O2 remains open.
11 November: r4 remediation candidate
Assessment reuse, durable failure reviews and consistent backup export
1,624 local tests passed, 14 skipped. The independent patch review exposed two regressions, reproduced and corrected: SDK compatibility and recovery after an acquisition hold. Sensitive-source routing, bounded provider diagnostics and administrative readiness were strengthened. This is a new candidate, separate from hosted r3; no r4 deployment, live semantic result or 500-policy/day qualification is claimed.
9 November: real API semantic trial
6 analyst outputs · 1 table-context hold · 0 verifier verdicts from 11 attempts
Twelve authored synthetic cases, 17 generation attempts, no retries. Verifier: 8 HTTP 504, 2 HTTP 503 and 1 AbortError. Unavailability is not a correct rejection or a semantic verdict. Applicable-law risk was flagged despite model impact 5; consent wording remains disputed in advisory review.
9 November: isolated durable-worker diagnostic
Analyst succeeded; verifier HTTP 504; task queued at verification
Controlled HTML transport and an explicitly rewound lab timer, not live source acquisition or elapsed observation days. Policy, snapshots and baseline preserved; zero public changes, notifications or claim-ledger rows. The workflow did not complete.
8 November: dedicated free API access
Two local SDK connectivity probes passed; Free tier reconfirmed on 9 November
A dedicated local credential enables bounded experiments. This does not configure hosted r3 or qualify semantics. Observed quotas: analyst 500 requests/day, verifier 20. The latter cannot support 500 changed documents requiring verification per day; 500 unchanged checks are a different workload.
7 November: O2 assessment started on r3
120 baseline tests passed · 5 new private-ledger controls passed
Offline diagnostics and injected model responses, not live semantic accuracy. Unsupported, uncertain, missing-verdict and same-model cases retain private evidence without public effects.
An integral linked annex remains outside the acquired parent. Exact quotations do not establish entailment; the live verifier is still unmeasured. Table-span markers and hidden exception text were retained, so those fixtures do not prove text loss.
O2 hosted capacity prerequisites
113 policy rows · 1 source contract · no configured API model pair
Read-only check at 20:58 UTC: no Gemini credential or analyst/verifier model in deployment configuration, zero claim-ledger rows. Browser Gemini/GLM reviews are advisory. General completeness, semantic accuracy and 500 fully processed policies/day remain unqualified; free-only access is required.
One bounded Apple run: 8.027 seconds, one HTTP 200 held pending confirmation, three missing source contracts. No inference or claim-ledger rows; publication and notifications disabled. Source completeness and full 500-policy/day operation remain unqualified.
Local Mac acquisition/extraction only, 305 service names and 290 origins from pinned Open Terms Archive metadata. Two endpoints skipped after origin backoff; all failures retained. No models, renderer or reviewed contracts. This does not qualify 500 fully processed policies/day.
6 November: independent Apple browser comparison
12 sections expanded · 81/81 visible leaf occurrences in Preview · 6/81 in the stable extractor replay
One document, later independent browser request and occurrence-aware normalized comparison. Stable replay hash matches the hosted receipt. Linked documents and PDF copies are outside this sample; no general completeness approval.
Missing middle clause, repeated occurrence, table row or section body can survive title/heading/tail/length checks. This demonstrates a contract limitation, not a proven live omission or public false alert.
Completed in 7.802 seconds, observe/silent. Eight official/configuration table hashes, release metadata and the previous report were preserved. No AI inference or public policy change. Main candidate separately passed 120 engine tests; 500 injected expired leases recovered in 1.062 seconds.
Table-encoding follow-up candidate
1,569 local tests passed · 14 skipped, including four new table regressions
An initial CI failure caught a stale whole-engine manifest; it was regenerated without weakening the guard. The encoding correction is separate from the hosted artifact and requires a new live cohort. No injection exploit was established.
Actual private hosted Preview
47 checks passed; Apple HTTP 200 and a completed private comparison
One source contract was eligible; three other policies remained held. Public records and notifications were unchanged. An earlier read timeout is retained; sustained hosting availability and full coverage remain unqualified.
Standalone startup, HTTP/worker identity and missing-flag privacy verified. The first hosted build failure and the corrected local harness failure remain recorded. This row does not establish online availability.
Private preview HTTP and worker checks
44 checks passed in an actual local production-mode Next runtime
Authentication boundaries, shared HTTP/worker identity and observe/silent restrictions were checked. Initial HTTP shells do not demonstrate hydrated browser controls; these local checks do not verify hosted deployment.
Live Apple privacy capture
HTTP 200 · eligible against the reviewed contract · 28,124 preview characters versus 2,089 stable characters
Both extractors used the same response. Outcome: confirmation_pending. No AI calls; official policy, baseline, public history and outbox records were unchanged. More characters do not prove completeness or correctness.
Recovery after an actual SIGKILL
New worker ownership after 91.7 seconds; queued work completed and the earlier report survived
The process was killed after the live run had completed. This checks persisted queued work and leadership expiry, not interruption during a network fetch. Official records and notification events remained unchanged.
Automated regression suite
1,469 passed · 14 skipped
Synthetic fixtures do not measure retrieval quality on the live catalogue.
Engine-specific tests
120 engine regressions + 16 daily-campaign checks
A 500-record scheduling test is not 500 successful Internet retrievals.
Build and static checks
Production build and TypeScript passed; lint had no errors
15 pre-existing web lint warnings remain; no independent dynamic security audit is claimed.
Administrative workflow
Approval and cancellation verified against an isolated database
One clearly labelled synthetic policy; no subscriber notifications.
Manual scan channels
14 boundary tests passed; selector, private report and JSON export verified in the browser
Two synthetic local policies: one extraction difference and one unavailable comparison. All policy fields preserved; zero official changes, check logs or notification events. Matching text would still leave completeness unqualified.
101 endpoints retrieved; 105 of 109 document scopes extracted. Four scopes failed retrieval/extraction; 79 extracted scopes still have unresolved structural checks. No source completeness is approved. Local Mac, no models or production writes.
Current parser daily campaign
3 valid dates of 3 · 2, 4 and 5 November · 71.894 hours
The bounded temporal target is met. Latest capture: 12/12 direct HTTP 200 in 39.631 seconds, no retry, fallback or 304. On 4 November, 12/12 took 46.168 seconds. This is not source completeness, weekly reliability or 500-source capacity.
Retained failed window: 3 November
11/12 sources · excluded from the daily count
Meta timed out on direct retrieval and HTTP/2 fallback. All 13 attempts and the 162.566-second failed window remain preserved. Today’s success does not erase that failure or add a retrospective day.
Saved source comparison
11/12 text hashes match 4 November · new AWS difference held
The saved AWS text has a new date, AWS Quick naming and AWS assistant Free Tier references in sections 50.10 and 50.13; net increase 52 characters. The earlier section-83 difference remains recorded. Snapshot differences are not legal interpretation, completeness approval or public policy-change notices.
Previous parser daily observations
2 counted windows · 12 sources · 31 October and 1 November, preserved
This earlier cohort remains incomplete and belongs to the previous parser. Its minimum observed span is 20.77 hours. At least 3 distinct dates, 20 hours between windows and 48 hours overall are required. PDF language remains unverified.
Mass recovery simulation
500 expired leases · 4 processes · 0.83 seconds
Expiry was injected in an isolated local database. A crash could leave a completed run marked as active; two reproduced regressions now pass after the recovery fix. VPS and 500-source live capacity remain unqualified.
Model-assisted code review
Gemini 4 High and GLM-5.3 Max reviewed frozen candidates
Review is not execution or certification. Subsequent fixes were tested locally.
Qualification pending
O2 is active; the capacity gate remains closed.
The bounded three-date observation is complete. Daily captures for this gate stop here; the failed 3 November window stays excluded and preserved. Work now focuses on independent source-completeness annotation, PDF language and original bytes, origin freshness, realistic capacity, evidence retention and recovery. The target is up to 500 policies per day; this scale is not yet qualified. Future temporal monitoring requires a new stated question and protocol.
Source identity and completeness
False change alerts and unsupported claims
Retrieval coverage, retries and latency
Model tokens and cost per changed document
Evidence growth, backup and restore
OCR for scanned PDFs, general PDF structure recovery, automatic source-contract onboarding and automatic evidence pruning are outside this preview. Ambiguous documents remain in review.